This is a study of the marks that were awarded for students’ personal attributes, used as peer assessment criteria, in their band rehearsals. Successive cohorts of first-year undergraduate students, from 2001 to 2009, were involved in the research comprising of 191 students and 84 bands. Data analysis focused on the strength of marking agreement and the variances between self- and peer-assessments. Personal attribute assessments that exhibited the greatest strength of marking agreement arose from when criteria were formulated together by bands, especially those attributes to which the group,as a whole, aspired; to a lesser extent, personal weakness criteria formulated by bands for each member. High flyers and female students underestimated themselves in their self-assessments,compared with those awarded by the band, especially when using criteria arising from their personal weaknesses; weaker students over-estimated themselves. In considering such misjudgements, this study raises questions about band members’ self-efficacy belief.\ud\udKeywords: popular music rehearsals; peer assessment; personal attributes; selfefficacy;\udgroup work
展开▼
机译:这是对在乐队排练中为学生的个人属性授予的标记(用作同伴评估标准)的研究。从2001年到2009年,连续一年的本科生队列参与了由191名学生和84个乐队组成的研究。数据分析的重点是标记协议的强度以及自我评估和同伴评估之间的差异。当乐队一起制定标准时,尤其是整个团队所追求的那些属性,就产生了表现出最大的评分一致性的个人属性评估;在较小程度上,乐队为每个成员制定的个人弱点标准。与乐队所给予的评价相比,高飞行者和女学生在自我评估中低估了自己,特别是在使用因个人弱点而产生的标准时;较弱的学生高估了自己。在考虑这种错误判断时,这项研究提出了有关乐队成员自我效能感的疑问。\ ud \ ud关键字:流行音乐彩排;同行评估;个人属性;自我效能感; \ udgroup工作
展开▼